以下是高顿网校小编为学员整理的:p3商务分析,供学员参考。
  JOB DESIGN
  Job design can be defined as the process of deciding on the contents of a job in terms of its duties and responsibilities, and on the relationships that should exist between the job holder and his/her superior, subordinates and colleagues.
  There are a number of approaches:
 
  1. The scientific approach This approach is associated with Frederick Taylor (1856–1915). Taylor believed that many workers went about their jobs inefficiently and without management direction as to the best way to accomplish tasks. He believed that it was management’s duty to investigate tasks and to arrange them in a scientific way that minimised wasted effort and maximised efficiency. The results of his studies in search of efficiency were that:
  · Jobs were fragmented into simple tasks
  · Manual workers simply had to get on with their simple, repetitive task and leave decision making to managers
  · The skill in each job should be minimised
  · The arrangement of machines should be such so as to minimise material and people movement.
  The approach was soon adopted enthusiastically by Henry Ford whose factories were based on mechanised production lines which determined the speed at which work had to be completed. It enabled the production of standard products at lower cost.
 
  2. Job rotation, job enlargement and job enrichment The scientific approach to management resulted in high productivity and also allowed workers’ wages to increase. However, it was criticised because it often turned employees into automatons, condemning them to mindless tasks and driven by the speed of the production line. Job satisfaction, motivation and pride in their work decreased. Often labour relations and quality were bad and commitment to employers was low.
  These problems gave rise to a recognition that job design should also pay attention to the employees’ social and psychological needs. This is the human relations school of management. Employees get bored, so more variety in work could be useful; employees like being challenged; employees like feeling they are contributing something worthwhile. This realisation gave rise to attempts at job redesign where managers aimed to produce ‘better’ jobs. Methods available are:
  · Job rotation. This is a horizontal change in the job, meaning that a worker is regularly moved from one simplified, de-skilled job to another. This should reduce worker boredom (at least for a while).
  · Job enlargement. Another horizontal change, but each job now consists of several unskilled tasks.
  · Job enrichment. This is a vertical change in which some of the tasks previously carried out by managers and supervisors are added to the job. For example, in addition to repetitive construction tasks the employee could now also be required to assess and report on the quality of the item.
  Of the three, job enrichment holds the most promise of long-term increases in job-satisfaction. It must be pointed out, however, that managers often do not find it easy to relinquish managerial control to their subordinates, so that frequently the apparent delegation of power is accompanied by increased monitoring of performance. In many organisations job enrichment might therefore be an illusion perpetrated by managers to try to keep employees happy, but without giving them any worthwhile discretion.
 
  3. Japanese management In the 1970s and 1980s Japanese manufacturing companies were world-leading. Companies such as Sony, Mitsubishi, Panasonic, Canon, Nikon, Toyota and Nissan usually beat their western competitors. Because of that success, much attention has been paid to Japanese management approaches. Much of the pioneering work was done in Toyota and resulted in their Toyota Production System. This approach is also known as ‘lean manufacturing’ and it concentrates on eliminating any activity and expenditure that does not add value to the finished product or service.
 
  There are three elements:
  · Elimination of waste: First the products and their manufacture have to be properly planned (for example by eliminating unnecessary parts or processes). Second, that planning has to be put into action (for example by scheduling production efficiently). Third, performance has to be monitored to identify where, despite the first two steps, things could still be improved. Just in time manufacturing is an example of an approach aimed at reducing waste.
  · Flexibility: In a traditional factory workers service a single production line running from receiving of raw materials to delivering the finished products. A breakdown in any part of the line nearly always resulted in the entire process halting until the problem was overcome. Cellular manufacturing systems separate the production line into cells or modules, each with a group of workers and machines. Each cell is dedicated to a particular component of the manufactured product. Ideally, workers and equipment comprising a particular cell are trained and configured to be able to take over the processes of another cell when necessary. Thus, the breakdown of one cell, due to equipment breakdown or staffing problems, does not radically affect the rest of the production process.
  · Quality: Quality of design and quality of conformance are essential if waste is to be eliminated and value added consistently. Japanese companies were the first to embrace the concept of total quality management. This addresses every activity an organisation carries out and encourages a culture of never being satisfied that further improvements are not possible.
 
  高顿网校小编寄语:人生终有许多选择。每一步都要慎重。但是一次选择不能决定一切。不要犹豫,作出选择就不要后悔。只要我们能不屈不挠地奋斗,胜利就在前方。

   ACCA官方微信    
  扫一扫微信,*9时间获取2014年ACCA考试报名时间和考试时间提醒
  
  高顿网校特别提醒:已经报名2014年ACCA考试的考生可按照复习计划有效进行!另外,高顿网校2014年ACCA考试辅导高清课程已经开通,通过针对性地讲解、训练、答疑、模考,对学习过程进行全程跟踪、分析、指导,可以帮助考生全面提升备考效果。
  
  报考指南:2014年ACCA考试备考指南
  免费题库:2014年ACCA考试免费题库
  考前冲刺:ACCA备考秘籍
  高清网课:ACCA考试网络课程