登录之后可查看解析

A is corrent. Since Rusk purchased the mortgage from Fast without knowledge of the previous sale to Beal, under a notice-type recordation statute, upon default, Rusk has the first priority to the property. He is entitled to the full face amount of Watts note. Under a notice-type statute there was no need for Rusk to record his mortgage first, only to take his mortgage without notice of the prior assignment. The fact that Rusk paid only 75% of the face value of the note does not prevent him from receiving the full face value. Rusk merely paid a discounted amount for the right to receive the face value of the note.
B is incorrect. Rusk will receive the full amount of the note since he received his mortgage without notice of the prior assignment.
C is incorrect. Rusk merely paid a discounted amount for the right to receive the full face value of the note.
D is incorrect. The fact that Fast did not record the mortgage prior to assigning it would not invalidate the assignments.