
微信扫一扫
实时资讯全掌握
Smith contracted to perform for $500 certain services for Jones. Jones claimed that the services had been performed poorly. Because of this, Jones sent Smith a check for only $425. Marked clearly on the check was "payment in full." Smith crossed out the words "payment in full" and cashed the check. Assuming that there was a bona fide dispute as to whether Smith had in fact performed the services poorly, the majority of courts would hold that A. The debt is liquidated, but Jones by adding the words "payment in full" cancelled the balance of the debt owed. B. The debt is unliquidated, but the crossing out of the words "payment in full" by Smith revives the balance of $75 owed. C. The debt is liquidated, and Smith can collect the remaining $75. D. The debt is unliquidated and the cashing of the check by Smith completely discharged the debt. |