登录之后可查看解析

B is corrent. Gott can win against Barret for the breach of contract because Gott, as a party to the contract, had an enforceable right against Barret who breached the contract.
A is incorrect because Riggo was not an intended beneficiary under the contract but an incidental beneficiary. Even though Riggo may have benefited from a hotel next door, Riggo has no rights in the contract.
C is incorrect because although Gott may recover in the suit as a party to the contract, Riggo may not recover since s/he was only an incidental beneficiary since such benefits were not intended by Barret or Gott.
D is incorrect because Gott may recover as a party to the contract. Riggo may not recover as an incidental beneficiary.