微信扫一扫
实时资讯全掌握
Walter sees a ghost train ride advertised at a theme park and goes to the kiosk to buy a ticket. Excited about the ride, he does not read what is printed on the ticket but puts it straight into his pocket. Whilst on the train in the dark, his wallet is stolen by a pickpocket who is posing as Dracula. Walter wishes to claim against the management of the theme park. The management disclaims liability on the basis that the ticket contained a clause limiting liability for loss or theft on the premises. Will Walter be successful in his claim? A. No, because Walter is deemed to have read the exclusion clause and be aware of its contents, even though he has not done so. B. No, because the management have a valid exclusion clause that was properly communicated to Walter at the time he purchased his ticket. C. Yes, because insufficient notice of the clause was given at the time of the agreement. D. Yes because it is not reasonable to restrict liability for loss or theft in a consumer contract. |