
微信扫一扫
实时资讯全掌握
Price and White entered into an all-inclusive written contract involving the purchase of a building. Their written agreement contained provisions concerning renovation work to the building to be completed by Price. This aspect of the written contract was modified by a contemporaneous oral agreement between the parties. Price relies upon the parol evidence rule to support his position that the written contract is binding on the parties. Which of the following is correct? A. The parol evidence rule does not apply to contemporaneous oral agreements. B. Since the oral agreement related to the same subject matter as the written contract, the parol evidence rule does not apply. C. Since the Statute of Frauds was satisfied in respect to the contract for the purchase of the building, the parol evidence does not apply. D. White will be precluded from introducing into evidence proof of the oral agreement because of the parol evidence rule. |