D is corrent. The requirement is to determine whether Fleur’s retained earnings and interest payable were reported correctly in the year 1 financial statements. Since cost of goods sold was understated in year 1, not enough cost was deducted from sales, resulting in an overstatement of income and retained earnings. However, the interest expense for 3 months would also be misstated because it was calculated as 16% of the face value of the note rather than as 11% of the present value of the note. On February 1 when the note is paid these two effects will have offset each other. However, on December 31, year 1, retained earnings would be misstated. Interest payable was properly accrued at the 16% stated (cash) rate for the 3 months from the date the note was issued until year-end, resulting in the correct reporting of interest payable.
A is incorrect. Since cost of goods sold was understated in year 1, not enough cost was deducted from sales, resulting in an overstatement of income and retained earnings. However, the interest expense for 3 months would also be misstated because it was calculated as 16% of the face value of the note rather than as 11% of the present value of the note. On February 1 when the note is paid these two effects will have offset each other. However, on December 31, year 1, retained earnings would be misstated. Interest payable was properly accrued at the 16% stated (cash) rate for the 3 months from the date the note was issued until year-end, resulting in the correct reporting of interest payable.
B is incorrect. Since cost of goods sold was understated in year 1, not enough cost was deducted from sales, resulting in an overstatement of income and retained earnings. However, the interest expense for 3 months would also be misstated because it was calculated as 16% of the face value of the note rather than as 11% of the present value of the note. On February 1 when the note is paid these two effects will have offset each other. However, on December 31, year 1, retained earnings would be misstated. Interest payable was properly accrued at the 16% stated (cash) rate for the 3 months from the date the note was issued until year-end, resulting in the correct reporting of interest payable.
C is incorrect. Since cost of goods sold was understated in year 1, not enough cost was deducted from sales, resulting in an overstatement of income and retained earnings. However, the interest expense for 3 months would also be misstated because it was calculated as 16% of the face value of the note rather than as 11% of the present value of the note. On February 1 when the note is paid these two effects will have offset each other. However, on December 31, year 1, retained earnings would be misstated. Interest payable was properly accrued at the 16% stated (cash) rate for the 3 months from the date the note was issued until year-end, resulting in the correct reporting of interest payable.
|
