Welch’s statement is incorrect because accounting standards require a firm that sells a held-to-maturity security before maturity to carry its remaining held-to-maturity securities at market value instead of cost. Since the Market Square debt is the only fixed-income investment trading above Zeisler’s cost, and it represents only a small part of Zeisler’s total fixed-income portfolio, the net effect of selling the Market Square debt would be to reduce assets (not raise them) because it would require Zeisler to mark down all its other fixed-income investments. A decline in assets would effectively increase the debt to assets ratio.

Dupree’s statement is also incorrect. The investment in General Nuclear would be carried on the books at fair market value, with the unrealized loss in equity. Selling the asset and converting it to cash would not materially affect total assets. However, selling the General Nuclear shares would reduce net income because the realized loss would have to be recognized in income. Thus, the sale would reduce reported ROA