
微信扫一扫
实时资讯全掌握
In year 1, Dart bought an office building from Graco under a written contract signed only by Dart. In year 27, Dart discovered that Graco made certain false representations during their negotiations concerning the building’s foundation. Dart could have reasonably discovered the foundation problems by year 7. Dart sued Graco claiming fraud in the formation of the contract. Which of the following statements is correct? A. Dart must prove that the alleged misrepresentations were part of the written contract because the contract involved real estate. B. The statute of limitations would likely prevent Dart from prevailing because of the length of time that has passed. C. Dart will be able to rescind the contract because both parties did not sign it. D. The parol evidence rule will prevent the admission into evidence of proof concerning Dart’s allegations. |