微信扫一扫
实时资讯全掌握
| According to the CFA Institute’s Standards of Professional Conduct, Fleming’s execution of Waverly’s trade order after confirming the appropriateness of the trade is most likely in violation of: A. Standard V(A)—Diligence and Reasonable Basis for not exercising diligence and thoroughness in his analysis of the investment and Standard III(C)—Suitability for recommending an investment before determining if the investment was appropriate for the client. B. Standard V(B)—Communication with Clients and Prospective Clients for not separating fact from opinion, but is not in violation of Standard I(C)—Misrepresentation because his guarantee of future investment performance was not a written representation. C. Standard I(C)—Misrepresentation for not disclosing to Waverly that he did not read the marketing materials, but is not in violation of Standard III(C)—Suitability because the client analyzed the investment thoroughly. |