登录之后可查看解析

C is corrent because under strict liability the only defenses available to a seller are misuse and assumption of risk. A buyer misuses a product when he uses it for some purpose other than the purpose for which the product was originally intended. Assumption of risk exists when an individual uses the product without regard to an inherent danger associated with the product. Privity of contract is not a defense under strict liability because the suit is not based on contract law.
A is incorrect because Kent does not have to establish fault under the strict liability theory in order to hold Grey liable. The strict liability allows the injured party to recover against either the manufacturer or the merchant seller.
B is incorrect because Dill’s only defenses are misuse and assumption of risk. The fact that Dill manufactured the saw in a nonnegligent manner is irrelevant under strict liability since Kent does not have to establish fault to hold Dill liable.
D is incorrect because strict liability in product liability cases is applied in the majority of jurisdictions.