On May 25, Fresno sold Bronson, a minor, a used computer. On June 1, Bronson reached the age of majority. On June 10, Fresno wanted to rescind the sale. Fresno offered to return Bronson's money and demanded that Bronson return the computer. Bronson refused, claiming that a binding contract existed. Bronson's refusal is:
|
a. | Not justified, because Fresno does not have to perform under the contract if Bronson has a right to disaffirm the contract. | |
b. | Not justified, because Fresno is not bound by the contract unless Bronson specifically ratifies the contract after reaching the age of majority. | |
c. | Justified, because Bronson and Fresno are bound by the contract as of the date Bronson reached the age of majority. | |
d. | Justified, because Fresno must perform under the contract regardless of Bronson's minority. |
|
